What the reports say
- Multiple outlets (via ESPN / Shams Charania) report that Giannis Antetokounmpo internally considered leaving Milwaukee this offseason, and that New York was the only team he would entertain as a destination outside of the Bucks. Bleacher Report+3Hoops Rumors+3SI+3
- In July, Giannis and one of his agents reportedly met with Bucks GM Jon Horst in Athens, where he raised “serious questions” about Milwaukee’s ability to contend. Hoops Rumors+1
- In August, the Knicks reached out, and the Bucks “picked up the call” — there was a short window of discussions between the two teams. Bleacher Report+4NBC Sports+4Hoops Rumors+4
- However, the conversations never progressed:
• Milwaukee reportedly pushed back, indicating they preferred to keep Giannis. Bleacher Report+3NBC Sports+3Hoops Rumors+3
• From the Knicks’ side, sources say they felt the Bucks were not serious about the trade. Bleacher Report+3NBC Sports+3Hoops Rumors+3
• Also, New York allegedly didn’t submit a strong enough offer to push the talks forward. SI+3NBC Sports+3Hoops Rumors+3 - On media day, Giannis didn’t deny the reports; he admitted “this summer he considered a move” as part of exploring his options, but affirmed he wants to be on a team that competes at a high level. NBC Sports
Key obstacles / constraints
- Lack of draft capital / trade assets for NY: The Knicks are reportedly limited in what they can offer — they have only one tradable first‑round pick (heavily protected) due to past dealings. The Score+3Hoops Rumors+3SI+3
- Mismatch in ambitions: The Bucks seemed reluctant to seriously engage unless the Knicks made a truly compelling bid, which reportedly didn’t happen. SI+3NBC Sports+3Hoops Rumors+3
- Milwaukee’s position: The Bucks have insisted they want to retain Giannis and will only trade him if absolutely necessary (i.e., if he demands it). NBC Sports+2Hoops Rumors+2
- Timing and urgency: Though the Knicks had interest, their roster moves (e.g. signing Mikal Bridges, Karl-Anthony Towns) may have constrained their flexibility mid‑offseason. SI+2SI+2
What it implies moving forward
- The fact that talks were ever entertained suggests Giannis is seriously considering his options, even if he hasn’t pushed publicly.
- The Bucks may use the first part of the season to prove they can contend and re‑anchor the relationship with Giannis.
- If things go poorly in Milwaukee or Giannis grows more frustrated, this kind of trade discussion could resurface, possibly with different suitors or under more urgency.
- For the Knicks, the cost to acquire him would likely have to be very steep (involving stars, multiple assets, protected picks, etc.) to change the Bucks’ stance.
